Archive

Archive for the ‘Humans’ Category

Cellphone Use Tied to Brain Changes – NYTimes.com

Cellphone Use Tied to Changes in Brain Activity

Researchers from the National Institutes of Health have found that less than an hour of cellphone use can speed up brain activity in the area closest to the phone antenna, raising new questions about the health effects of low levels of radiation emitted from cellphones.

The researchers, led by Dr. Nora D. Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, urged caution in interpreting the findings because it is not known whether the changes, which were seen in brain scans, have any meaningful effect on a person’s overall health.

But the study, published Wednesday in The Journal of the American Medical Association, is among the first and largest to document that the weak radio-frequency signals from cellphones have the potential to alter brain activity.



“The study is important because it documents that the human brain is sensitive to the electromagnetic radiation that is emitted by cellphones,” Dr. Volkow said. “It also highlights the importance of doing studies to address the question of whether there are — or are not — long-lasting consequences of repeated stimulation, of getting exposed over five, 10 or 15 years.”

Although preliminary, the findings are certain to reignite a debate about the safety of cellphones. A few observational studies have suggested a link between heavy cellphone use and rare brain tumors, but the bulk of the available scientific evidence shows no added risk. Major medical groups have said that cellphones are safe, but some top doctors, including the former director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Center and prominent neurosurgeons, have urged the use of headsets as a precaution.

Dr. Volkow said that the latest research is preliminary and does not address questions about cancer or other heath issues, but it does raise new questions about potential areas of research to better understand the health implications of increased brain activity resulting from cellphone use.

“Unfortunately this particular study does not enlighten us in terms of whether this is detrimental or if it could even be beneficial,” Dr. Volkow said. “It just tells us that even though these are weak signals, the human brain is activated by them.”

Most major medical groups, including the American Cancer Society, theNational Cancer Institute and the Food and Drug Administration, have said the existing data on cellphones and health has been reassuring, particularly a major European study released last year by the World Health Organizationthat found no increased risk of rare brain tumors among cellphone users.

When asked to comment on the latest study, the leading industry trade group,CTIA – The Wireless Association, released a statement emphasizing recent studies that have shown no elevated cancer risk associated with cellphone use.

“The peer-reviewed scientific evidence has overwhelmingly indicated that wireless devices, within the limits established by the F.C.C., do not pose a public health risk or cause any adverse health effects,” said John Walls, vice president of public affairs for the trade group, adding that leading global health groups “all have concurred that wireless devices are not a public health risk.”

For the full Article click Below Source New York Times

Cellphone Use Tied to Brain Changes – NYTimes.com.

The mathematics of fish schools and flocks of humans

What drives groups of individual animals to act in a coherent manner? Everyone has seen the oddly coordinated behavior exhibited by flocks of birds or schools of fish as they turn, sweep, and rotate seemingly as one. But how does a group of individuals make decisions about how to move and where to go at once? Do they follow some prescribed and describable mathematical behavior? A symposium at this year’s AAAS conference attempted to answer this question.

Professor Ian Couzin from Princeton University opened the symposium by describing his work on modeling the underlying behavior of large groups of individuals. In his work, he describes the equation of motion for any individual entity as governed by three factors: a short-range repulsive behavior, an intermediate range desire to align with neighbors, and a long-range attraction to the group as a whole.

Simulated swarms of creatures that follow these simple rules are able to reproduce the complex motions seen in fish in his laboratory’s aquarium. If any one of his three rules is neglected, then the medium-range coherent motion disappears. The addition of an “avoid the predator” rule turned out to be very successful in mimicking the behavior of his fish when they were attacked by a robotic fish predator that was designed for his research.

Taking the work further, to understand what it takes to lead and to follow, he looked at a slight modification of these rules in which each individual’s motion was defined by two terms: the conventional rules above, plus a linearly weighted “leader” factor that would cause the individual to move towards a goal, or in some specified direction. It turns out that only a few individuals in a group need to know where they are going in order to lead the group, even if they don’t do anything to communicate their leadership role other than move.

Also, the larger a group gets, the smaller the percentage of “knowledgeable” or “leader” individuals that are needed. The limit seems to be about five percent; the remaining 95 percent simply followed the herd. This has interesting implications for evolutionary roles and needs as it sheds light on what a group needs to survive.

Swarming high school students

Bridging the gap between swarming creatures and humans, he reported on an experiment of asking undergrads to evacuate a gym with many exits without talking or communicating with one another. Turns out, much like in his simple models, the group would follow a handful of individuals who were told a specific exit to use ahead of time. Interesting implications/explanations for high school abound here.

The following talk also looked at the spontaneous organization of humans in crowds; Pierre Degond of Paul Sabatier University was motivated by an understanding of crowd safety, and how to design comfortable and efficient areas for crowds to gather in or move through. At high densities—greater than seven people per square meter (gah!)—crowds of humans behave much like incompressible fluids, their motion described by the Navier-Stokes equation. However, at lower, more common densities, there is no single way to model a crowd’s behavior.

For the Full article click the link below

The mathematics of fish schools and flocks of humans

Secrets of a Mind-Gamer – NYTimes.com

Categories: Humans, Interesting Reads Tags: